The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change just got slammed to the mat again by the InterAcademy Council. The InterAcademy Council was formed in 2000 to give "high-quality advice to international bodies and has finished a thorough review of IPCC practices and has found them badly wanting. Click on the title below to download the full report in PDF format.
Climate Change Assessments,Review of the Processes and Procedures of the IPCC
To read a interesting take on the InterAcademy Council report and other instances of the IPCC presenting false or flawed data click on the title below.
Meltdown of the climate 'consensus'
It looks like NOAA got caught falsifying climate data in an attempt to promote a belief in out of control global warming. The tax-payer funded National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has become mired in fresh global warming data scandal involving numbers for the Great Lakes region that substantially ramp up averages. The beleaguered federal agency appears to be implicated in the most blatant and extreme case of climate data fraud yet seen. Even after all the facts about climate fraud in the United Nations, the United Kingdom and that bullshit film Al Gore made Liberals will still scream that man made global warming is real supported by data that is beyond discussion. These Demwits have even likened people who don't believe in the purity of the data to Holocaust deniers. Follow the link below to get the scoop.
US Government in Massive New Global Warming Scandal – NOAA Disgraced
I found this video and it presents some interesting points less the Church Of Man Made Global Warming nonsense.
The Fraud of Free Energy Video
Al Gore recently stated whats a few mistakes when he was referring to the false data and lies that climate scientists published to support Man Made Global Warming. Members of the Church Of Man Made Global Warming are sticking to their story and doubling down on attacks on people who believe science has not been used thus far in determining Man Made Global Warming yet alone Global Warming itself. Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Joe Barton, R-Texas, is citing the doubts about the integrity of "climate change" science in a letter asking for an accounting of U.S. taxpayer support for the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC. We all know this action by Joe Barton is not enough to stop these radicals from taxing us to death in the name of climate change. Read the article, click on the link below:
Clash over 'global warming' ratcheted up another degree
Congressman wants funding stopped; scientists plan retaliation campaign
Below is a link to a chart that list main events in the Man Made Global Warming Scam:
If your faith in today's scientific establishment was shaken recently by successive waves of fraud on the part of climate scientists – from systematically suppressing evidence of global cooling, to attempting to erase the Middle Ages, to falsely claiming the Himalayan glaciers were rapidly melting – get ready for more scientific corruption, a lot more. Read the article by clicking the link below:
From global warming to evolution, psychology to sociology, corruption runs deep
Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) today asked the Obama administration to investigate what he called “the greatest scientific scandal of our generation” — the actions of climate scientists revealed by the Climate gate files, and the subsequent admissions by the editors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). It's about time someone in our government asks what the hell is going on and why did Al Gore tell lies while he was under oath to congress and make a movie supporting his fiction. You will almost never witness a Liberal (Demwit) ask for clarification on an agenda that has been placed in the LiboFascist in-box! These radical environmental leftists seek to tax and control large portions of the world economy based on falsehoods and personal agendas and not scientific facts. I for one do not want my kid being indoctrinated into the cult of man made global warming.
Click the link below to read more:
Yet another outright falsehood by so called man made global warming experts has been uncovered! It seems that radical sea level changes that environmental radicals have been blasting in every medium possible has been debunked and the study withdrawn. When will the people of the world realize that claims of man made global warming and it's effects are just a tool to tax and control populations. This whole global warming crowd has tried to pull the biggest scam in history and has been caught red handed. Obama is still pushing the global warming garbage in an attempt at mass income redistribution and tax fraud!
Climate scientists withdraw journal claims of rising sea levels
Here we go again into the Man Made Global Warming Scam! People really need to stop treating scientists like they are know it all Gods. Scientists have reached the wrong conclusions so many times in the past I take what they say with a grain of salt. Common sense is the best defense you can utilize against false claims that something is good or bad for you. Common sense also works in many other areas. Now the scientist at the center of the man made global warming hysteria has stated he was wrong and the earth is not warming. He also states that he has trouble organizing data. Read the entire article by click the link below:
Climategate U-turn as scientist at center of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
For another take on this so called scientist as Boortz sees it click on the link below:
While I do not believe the toxins we spew into the atmosphere are harmless neither do I believe the junk the IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and other so called climatologists print. The leaders of climate science have been shown to falsify data, include opinions of radicals as science fact and slander any scientist who raises questions as to the conclusions of The Church Of Man Made Global Warming. Climate change radicals also tried to sell man made global warming by changing the name to simply climate change. On the other side there are people who don't believe we are harming our environment and they are just as bad as Al Gore and his freaks.
Utah delivers vote of no confidence for 'climate alarmists'
Click on the link below to read the entire article:
A group of hackers have exposed The Cult Of Man Made Global Warming and found that scientists have been not only falsifying data to support false claims and climate models but have suppressed data that would deny claims of man made global warming. People with any degree of common sense and a bit of intelligence have known the so called science of man made global warming was rife with false data, political agendas as well as defective and inadequate climate models. Hundreds of prominent scientists have made it known that they do not agree with the United Nations climate scientists or the LiboFascists pushing the global warming agenda to control populations. Even after proof was presented that climate models were in error and data collected was corrupted by sloppy gathering methods people and governments did nothing. Now some hackers have provided a mountain of proof that many scientists that are at the top of climate change power structure have knowingly lied and openly plotted to falsify data and establish a scare campaign to improve funding, deceive the public and influence government policy globally. Follow the links below for more information on this scam:
Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'?
Climategate reminds us of the liberal-left's visceral loathing of open debate
UN climate change expert: there could be more errors in report
Orginal article below:
Former disgraced U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, now president of the Geneva-based Global Humanitarian Forum has released a very shaky study titled Human Impact Report The Anatomy of A Silent Crisis on the interaction of green house gas emissions and human deaths caused by wars, floods, drought and other disasters. Roger Pielke, Jr., an expert in disaster trends at the University of Colorado calls the Annan report “Worse Than Fiction”. People of reason know that man made global warming movement is about power and control over the world's population. These people could care less about the environment, the only need they have is to line their own pockets. A perfect example of this corruption is Al Gore who reaps millions of dollars from his green efforts.
Click on the graphic below to read the article.
More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
The cult of “Man Made Global Warming” is taking more hits as scientists speak out against oppressive politicians, scientists and the United Nations. The fanatical Man Made Global Warming cult maintains that Man Made Global Warming is a irrefutable fact when there is and has been scientific evidence to the contrary. The people who support man made global warming have attempted to destroy the reputation and livelihood of those who disagreed with them by labeling them global warming deniers or Flat Earthers. Some how the people who do not support the notion of man made global warming are just as bad as Holocaust Deniers and are less intelligent than those that do. Liberals will always use this tactic when they are cornered and can not support their argument with facts. Liberals will label you a racist, bigot, hater or any number of socially negative terms if you do not support their agenda. Here are just a few observations from leading scientists from around the world on man made global warming. (click on the report title below to download the 231 page PDF)
More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over
Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Scientists Continue to Debunk “Consensus” in 2008
Over 650 dissenting scientists from around the globe challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 231-page U.S. Senate Minority
Report report -- updated from 2007’s groundbreaking report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus” -- features the skeptical voices of over 650 prominent international scientists, including many current
and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC. This updated report includes an additional 250 (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the initial release in December 2007. The over 650 dissenting scientists are more than 12 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers. The chorus of skeptical scientific voices grow louder in 2008 as a steady stream of peerreviewed studies, analyses, real world data and inconvenient developments challenged the UN and former Vice President Al Gore's claims that the "science is settled" and there
is a "consensus." On a range of issues, 2008 proved to be challenging for the promoters of man-made climate fears. Promoters of anthropogenic warming fears endured the following: Global temperatures failing to warm; Peer-reviwed studies predicting a
continued lack of warming; a failed attempt to revive the discredited “Hockey Stick”; inconvenient developments and studies regarding CO2; the Sun; Clouds; Antarctica; the Arctic; Greenland; Mount Kilimanjaro; Hurricanes; Extreme Storms; Floods; Ocean
Acidification; Polar Bears; lack of atmosphieric dust; the failure of oceans to warm and rise as predicted. In addition, the following developments further secured 2008 as the year the “consensus” collapsed. Russian scientists “rejected the very idea that carbon dioxide may be responsible for global warming”. An American Physical Society editor conceded that a “considerable presence” of scientific skeptics exist. An International team of scientists countered the UN IPCC, declaring: “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate”. India Issued a report challenging global warming fears. International Scientists demanded the UN IPCC “be called to account and cease its deceptive practices,” and a canvass of more than 51,000 Canadian scientists revealed 68% disagree that global warming science is “settled.” This new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's office
of the GOP Ranking Member is the latest evidence of the growing groundswell of scientific opposition challenging significant aspects of the claims of the UN IPCC and Al Gore. Many scientific meetings are now being dominated by a growing number of skeptical scientists. The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists' equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. [See Full report Here: & see: Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: '2/3 of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC' Even the mainstream media has begun to take notice of the expanding number of scientists serving as “consensus busters.” A November 25, 2008 article in Politico noted that a “growing accumulation” of science is challenging warming fears, and added that the “science behind global warming may still be too shaky to warrant cap-and-trade legislation.” Canada’s Financial Post noted on October 20, 2008, that “the number of climate change skeptics is growing rapidly.” New York Times environmental reporter Andrew Revkin noted on March 6, 2008, "As we all know, climate science is not a numbers game (there are heaps of signed statements by folks with advanced degrees on all sides of this issue)," Revkin wrote. (LINK) In 2007, Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics "appear to be expanding rather than shrinking." Skeptical scientists are gaining recogniction despite what many say is a bias against them in parts of the scientific community and are facing significant funding disadvantages. Dr. William M. Briggs, a climate statistician who serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee, explained that his colleagues described “absolute horror stories of what happened to them when they tried getting papers published that explored non-‘consensus’ views.” Briggs, in a March 4, 2008, report, described the behavior as “really outrageous and unethical behavior on the parts of some editors. I was shocked.” (LINK) [Note: An August 2007 report detailed how proponents of man-made global warming fears enjoy a monumental funding advantage over skeptical scientists. LINK and a July 2007 Senate report detailing how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation Highlights of the Updated 2008 Senate Minority Report featuring over 650 international scientists dissenting from man-made climate fears: “I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical. “The main basis of the claim that man’s release of greenhouse gases is the cause of the warming is based almost entirely upon climate models. We all know the frailty of models concerning the air-surface system” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology, and formerly of NASA, who has authored more
than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years. ”Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical
chemist. “The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.
“So far, real measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future warming.” - Scientist Dr. Jarl R. Ahlbeck, a chemical engineer at Abo Akademi University in Finland, author of 200 scientific publications and former Greenpeace member.
“Anyone who claims that the debate is over and the conclusions are firm has a fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous issues of our time.” - Solar physicist Dr. Pal Brekke, senior advisor to the Norwegian Space Centre in Oslo. Brekke has published more than 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles on the sun and solar interaction with the Earth. “The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico “It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of
scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA. “Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ. “After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review. “The Kyoto theorists have put the cart before the horse. It is global warming that triggers higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, not the other way round…A large number of critical documents submitted at the 1995 U.N. conference in Madrid vanished without a trace. As a result, the discussion was one-sided and heavily biased, and the U.N. declared global warming to be a scientific fact,” Andrei Kapitsa, a Russian
geographer and Antarctic ice core researcher. “Nature's regulatory instrument is water vapor: more carbon dioxide leads to less
moisture in the air, keeping the overall GHG content in accord with the necessary balance conditions.” – Prominent Hungarian Physicist and environmental researcher Dr. Miklós Zágoni reversed his view of man-made warming and is now a skeptic. Zágoni
was once Hungary’s most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol. “For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden. “Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself
solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN
IPCC committee. “The quantity of CO2 we produce is insignificant in terms of the natural circulation between air, water and soil... I am doing a detailed assessment of the UN IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science.” - South Afican Nuclear Physicist and Chemical Engineer Dr. Philip Lloyd, a UN IPCC co-coordinating lead author who has authored over 150 refereed publications. “Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh. “All those urging action to curb global warming need to take off the blinkers and give some thought to what we should do if we are facing global cooling instead” - Geophysicist Dr. Phil Chapman, an astronautical engineer and former NASA astronaut, served as staff physicist at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) “Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” -
Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles. “CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.
“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology
Department at the University of La Plata.
Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), which is run by Al Gore's chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, and is one of four bodies responsible for monitoring global temperatures, announced that last month was the hottest October on record. GISS claimed to have discovered a new "hotspot" in the Arctic - in a month when satellite images were showing Arctic sea-ice recovering so fast from its summer melt that three weeks ago it was 30 per cent more extensive than at the same time last year. Across the world record low temperatures were bring reported as were the earliest snow falls. What happened how could GISS get global temperature profiles this wrong? Is GISS falsifying data to support it's global warming agenda or are these scientists just that incompetent! This is not the first time climatologists stated rising global temperatures based on corrupt data points nor will it be the last. Al Gore and the United Nations have much profit and power at stake here in the fight to make us true believers in the cult of man made global warming. If we can get all governments on board the global warming train new and hefty taxes will be levied on the world population all in the name of global warming. I know you have heard of carbon taxes, people complaining that certain foods are bad for the environment, having more than one kid is selfish and cows have large carbon footprints that must be taxed!
I am one of those people who truly believe that the global warming hysteria is driven by political motives and not by science as Liberals would have us believe. The climate models that the priests of global warming utilize to scare and convince all of us that they have all the answers have been proven faulty and in total disagreement to what is actually happening to our world. Prominent people like Al Gore try to stop all discussion on man made global warming by stating that the facts are undeniable yet thousands of climate scientists disagree. Our liberal media follows the Liberal Socialist mantra of man made global warming like it is a done deal. The climate models currently in use were designed by people who do not fully understand our global climate and in fact have a political agenda. The old saying about computers applies here, garbage in and garbage out. This global warming hysteria is designed to brake the United State's economic back and redistribute wealth. Just look at the Kyoto Protocol , if this was really about protecting our environment why are nations like China and India exempt from emissions reduction? Who does Al Gore fly around in a private jet and why does his house use 17 times more power than the average American house? What is happening is the rich Liberal Elite will continue their current lifestyle because they can afford, solar power, green cars and all the other gimmicks these people use to justify taking our rights and destroying our standard of living. One of the most popular frauds is carbon credits. If you have been watching the news you would have heard Al Gore talk about how he has become carbon neutral by purchasing carbon credits. Al Gore forgot to tell you he owns a part of a company that sells these so called carbon credits. Oh ya, what about sending the money Americans pay for carbon credits overseas? These Liberal Socialists are trying everything they can to damage America so you better wake up!
For another look at Global Warming check out "The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated"
| < Prev |
|---|
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}